Side by sideSuburb comparison

Curlew Waters vs Kiacatoo.

Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk. Curlew Waters edges out on more headline metrics in this comparison.

On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Curlew Waters (884) sits above Kiacatoo (875). Kiacatoo skews owner-occupied (56%), Curlew Waters runs more rental-dense (44% owner).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.

For investors

Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.

For families

Curlew Waters edges out on average school ICSEA (884 vs 875).

Common questionsCurlew Waters vs Kiacatoo

Common questions

Does Curlew Waters or Kiacatoo have better schools?

On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Curlew Waters scores 884 vs 875 in Kiacatoo. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.

The numbers behind the take

Curlew Waters
Metric
Kiacatoo

Price & Market

Median house
Median unit
+0.0%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
Days on market

Rental

$160/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$200/wk
$136/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$175/wk
44.0%
Owner occupied
56.0%
Renter occupied
31.0%

Lifestyle & Demographics

0
Walk score
0
0
Transit score
0
0
Bike score
0
21
Population
77
39
Median age
31

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

2
Schools nearby
5
884
Avg ICSEA
875

Climate

Annual rainfall
Mean max (Jan)

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).