Side by sideSuburb comparison

Darkes Forest vs Clifton.

Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk. Darkes Forest edges out on more headline metrics in this comparison.

On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Darkes Forest (1090) sits above Clifton (1087). Clifton skews owner-occupied (90%), Darkes Forest runs more rental-dense (58% owner).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.

For investors

Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.

For families

Darkes Forest edges out on average school ICSEA (1090 vs 1087). Clifton also has a higher family-household share (120% vs 77%), so the catchment community skews family-heavy.

Common questionsDarkes Forest vs Clifton

Common questions

Does Darkes Forest or Clifton have better schools?

On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Darkes Forest scores 1090 vs 1087 in Clifton. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.

The numbers behind the take

Darkes Forest
Metric
Clifton

Price & Market

Median house
Median unit
+0.0%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
Days on market

Rental

$530/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$550/wk
$488/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$480/wk
58.0%
Owner occupied
90.0%
35.0%
Renter occupied
60.0%

Lifestyle & Demographics

0
Walk score
0
0
Transit score
0
0
Bike score
70
95
Population
35
45
Median age
41

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

10
Schools nearby
14
1090
Avg ICSEA
1087

Climate

Annual rainfall
Mean max (Jan)

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).