Darlington vs Seacombe Heights

Darlington scores higher on walkability (22/100 vs 4/100 ), useful if you're optimising for a car-light household. Seacombe Heights skews owner-occupied (85%), Darlington runs more rental-dense (68% owner).

Buying in Darlington or Seacombe Heights?

The free buying guide: what you can really spend, the schemes and stamp duty in your state, inspecting, and making the offer.
Get the free buying guide

Selling in Darlington? The free selling guide

Darlington and Seacombe Heights side by side

MeasureDarlingtonSeacombe Heights
Price and market
Median house–$1,050,000
Median unit–$274,320
House price change, 12 months–-19.5%
Renting
House rent$640/wk$375/wk
Unit rent$430/wk$380/wk
Owner occupied68.0%85.0%
Renter occupied28.0%13.0%
Schools
Schools nearby2020
Average ICSEA10651065
Lifestyle and people
Walk score224
Transit score00
Bike score100100
Population1,2751,549
Median age3940
Climate
Annual rainfall601 mm601 mm
Mean max, January28.0°C28.0°C

Green dot: better on that measure (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk). Each suburb’s profile gives the source and period of its figures.

Which suits whom

For buyers
We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.
For investors
Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.
For families
Seacombe Heights has a heavier family-household mix (80% vs 65%), which typically signals stronger demand for family-amenable infrastructure (parks, schools, supermarkets).

Darlington vs Seacombe Heights: common questions

Which is more walkable, Darlington or Seacombe Heights?

Darlington scores 22/100 on walkability vs 4/100. Above 70 is considered very walkable (most errands on foot), 50-69 is walkable for some errands, below 50 typically requires a car for daily life.