Side by sideSuburb comparison

Dawes Point vs Mcmahons Point.

Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk. Mcmahons Point edges out on more headline metrics in this comparison.

On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Mcmahons Point (1173) sits above Dawes Point (1122). Dawes Point skews owner-occupied (61%), Mcmahons Point runs more rental-dense (46% owner).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.

For investors

Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.

For families

Mcmahons Point edges out on average school ICSEA (1173 vs 1122). Dawes Point also has a higher family-household share (74% vs 53%), so the catchment community skews family-heavy.

Common questionsDawes Point vs Mcmahons Point

Common questions

Does Dawes Point or Mcmahons Point have better schools?

On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Mcmahons Point scores 1173 vs 1122 in Dawes Point. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.

The numbers behind the take

Dawes Point
Metric
Mcmahons Point

Price & Market

Median house
Median unit
+0.0%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
Days on market

Rental

$625/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$580/wk
$1450/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$580/wk
61.0%
Owner occupied
46.0%
35.0%
Renter occupied
52.0%

Lifestyle & Demographics

100
Walk score
100
40
Transit score
30
100
Bike score
100
385
Population
2,315
55
Median age
44

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

20
Schools nearby
20
1122
Avg ICSEA
1173

Climate

1302 mm
Annual rainfall
1302 mm
26.0°C
Mean max (Jan)
26.0°C

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).