Side by sideSuburb comparison

Delburn vs Thorpdale South.

Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk. Thorpdale South edges out on more headline metrics in this comparison.

On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Thorpdale South (981) sits above Delburn (958). Thorpdale South skews owner-occupied (171%), Delburn runs more rental-dense (100% owner).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.

For investors

Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.

For families

Thorpdale South edges out on average school ICSEA (981 vs 958). Delburn also has a higher family-household share (100% vs 71%), so the catchment community skews family-heavy.

Common questionsDelburn vs Thorpdale South

Common questions

Does Delburn or Thorpdale South have better schools?

On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Thorpdale South scores 981 vs 958 in Delburn. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.

The numbers behind the take

Delburn
Metric
Thorpdale South

Price & Market

Median house
Median unit
+0.0%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
Days on market

Rental

$258/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$300/wk
$220/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$160/wk
100.0%
Owner occupied
171.0%
25.0%
Renter occupied

Lifestyle & Demographics

0
Walk score
0
0
Transit score
0
0
Bike score
0
37
Population
27
59
Median age
48

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

20
Schools nearby
3
958
Avg ICSEA
981

Climate

Annual rainfall
Mean max (Jan)

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).