Side by sideSuburb comparison

Derriwong vs Fairholme.

Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk. Fairholme edges out on more headline metrics in this comparison.

On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Fairholme (913) sits above Derriwong (904). Derriwong skews owner-occupied (79%), Fairholme runs more rental-dense (47% owner).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.

For investors

Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.

For families

Fairholme edges out on average school ICSEA (913 vs 904). Fairholme also has a higher family-household share (107% vs 79%), so the catchment community skews family-heavy.

Common questionsDerriwong vs Fairholme

Common questions

Does Derriwong or Fairholme have better schools?

On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Fairholme scores 913 vs 904 in Derriwong. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.

The numbers behind the take

Derriwong
Metric
Fairholme

Price & Market

Median house
Median unit
+0.0%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
Days on market

Rental

$200/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$230/wk
$183/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$200/wk
79.0%
Owner occupied
47.0%
43.0%
Renter occupied

Lifestyle & Demographics

0
Walk score
0
0
Transit score
0
0
Bike score
0
38
Population
43
46
Median age
38

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

4
Schools nearby
5
904
Avg ICSEA
913

Climate

Annual rainfall
Mean max (Jan)

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).