Side by sideSuburb comparison

Dimboola vs Murra Warra.

Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk. Dimboola edges out on more headline metrics in this comparison.

Dimboola scores higher on walkability (18/100 vs 0/100 ), useful if you're optimising for a car-light household. Dimboola skews owner-occupied (80%), Murra Warra runs more rental-dense (61% owner).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.

For investors

Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.

For families

Murra Warra has a heavier family-household mix (74% vs 60%), which typically signals stronger demand for family-amenable infrastructure (parks, schools, supermarkets).

Common questionsDimboola vs Murra Warra

Common questions

Which is more walkable, Dimboola or Murra Warra?

Dimboola scores 18/100 on walkability vs 0/100. Above 70 is considered very walkable (most errands on foot), 50-69 is walkable for some errands, below 50 typically requires a car for daily life.

The numbers behind the take

Dimboola
Metric
Murra Warra

Price & Market

$252,500
Median house
$128,160
Median unit
+0.0%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
Days on market

Rental

$165/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$200/wk
$170/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$750/wk
80.0%
Owner occupied
61.0%
15.0%
Renter occupied

Lifestyle & Demographics

18
Walk score
0
0
Transit score
0
0
Bike score
0
1,635
Population
63
52
Median age
32

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

2
Schools nearby
2
973
Avg ICSEA
973

Climate

Annual rainfall
Mean max (Jan)

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).