Side by sideSuburb comparison

Dondingalong vs Burnt Bridge.

Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk. Burnt Bridge edges out on more headline metrics in this comparison.

On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Burnt Bridge (861) sits above Dondingalong (801). Dondingalong skews owner-occupied (86%), Burnt Bridge runs more rental-dense (39% owner).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.

For investors

Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.

For families

Burnt Bridge edges out on average school ICSEA (861 vs 801). Burnt Bridge also has a higher family-household share (89% vs 74%), so the catchment community skews family-heavy.

Common questionsDondingalong vs Burnt Bridge

Common questions

Does Dondingalong or Burnt Bridge have better schools?

On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Burnt Bridge scores 861 vs 801 in Dondingalong. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.

The numbers behind the take

Dondingalong
Metric
Burnt Bridge

Price & Market

Median house
Median unit
+0.0%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
Days on market

Rental

$295/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$295/wk
$330/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$178/wk
86.0%
Owner occupied
39.0%
11.0%
Renter occupied
21.0%

Lifestyle & Demographics

0
Walk score
0
0
Transit score
0
0
Bike score
30
712
Population
110
51
Median age
30

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

3
Schools nearby
11
801
Avg ICSEA
861

Climate

Annual rainfall
Mean max (Jan)

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).