Side by sideSuburb comparison

Double Bridges vs Waterholes.

Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk. Waterholes edges out on more headline metrics in this comparison.

On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Waterholes (970) sits above Double Bridges (967).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.

For investors

Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.

For families

Waterholes edges out on average school ICSEA (970 vs 967).

Common questionsDouble Bridges vs Waterholes

Common questions

Does Double Bridges or Waterholes have better schools?

On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Waterholes scores 970 vs 967 in Double Bridges. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.

The numbers behind the take

Double Bridges
Metric
Waterholes

Price & Market

Median house
Median unit
+0.0%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
Days on market

Rental

Rent (house / wk)
$280/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$238/wk
Owner occupied
36.0%
Renter occupied

Lifestyle & Demographics

0
Walk score
0
0
Transit score
0
0
Bike score
0
25
Population
12
61
Median age
60

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

20
Schools nearby
5
967
Avg ICSEA
970

Climate

Annual rainfall
Mean max (Jan)

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).