Side by sideSuburb comparison

Dulbelling vs Doodenanning.

Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk. Doodenanning edges out on more headline metrics in this comparison.

On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Doodenanning (945) sits above Dulbelling (941).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.

For investors

Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.

For families

Doodenanning edges out on average school ICSEA (945 vs 941). Dulbelling also has a higher family-household share (150% vs 62%), so the catchment community skews family-heavy.

Common questionsDulbelling vs Doodenanning

Common questions

Does Dulbelling or Doodenanning have better schools?

On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Doodenanning scores 945 vs 941 in Dulbelling. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.

The numbers behind the take

Dulbelling
Metric
Doodenanning

Price & Market

Median house
Median unit
+0.0%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
Days on market

Rental

$130/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$130/wk
$1500/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$111/wk
88.0%
Owner occupied
85.0%
Renter occupied

Lifestyle & Demographics

0
Walk score
0
0
Transit score
0
0
Bike score
0
52
Population
51
51
Median age
42

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

4
Schools nearby
6
941
Avg ICSEA
945

Climate

Annual rainfall
Mean max (Jan)

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).