Side by sideSuburb comparison

Dunk vs Tam O'Shanter.

Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk. Tam O'Shanter edges out on more headline metrics in this comparison.

On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Tam O'Shanter (941) sits above Dunk (915).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.

For investors

Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.

For families

Tam O'Shanter edges out on average school ICSEA (941 vs 915).

Common questionsDunk vs Tam O'Shanter

Common questions

Does Dunk or Tam O'Shanter have better schools?

On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Tam O'Shanter scores 941 vs 915 in Dunk. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.

The numbers behind the take

Dunk
Metric
Tam O'Shanter

Price & Market

Median house
Median unit
+0.0%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
Days on market

Rental

$300/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$300/wk
$200/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$255/wk
Owner occupied
Renter occupied

Lifestyle & Demographics

0
Walk score
0
0
Transit score
0
0
Bike score
0
23
Population
4,055
41
Median age
50

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

13
Schools nearby
8
915
Avg ICSEA
941

Climate

Annual rainfall
Mean max (Jan)

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).