Side by sideSuburb comparison

Duramana vs Peel.

Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk. Duramana edges out on more headline metrics in this comparison.

On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Duramana (980) sits above Peel (977). Peel skews owner-occupied (102%), Duramana runs more rental-dense (85% owner).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.

For investors

Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.

For families

Duramana edges out on average school ICSEA (980 vs 977).

Common questionsDuramana vs Peel

Common questions

Does Duramana or Peel have better schools?

On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Duramana scores 980 vs 977 in Peel. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.

The numbers behind the take

Duramana
Metric
Peel

Price & Market

Median house
Median unit
+0.0%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
Days on market

Rental

$320/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$320/wk
$300/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$410/wk
85.0%
Owner occupied
102.0%
3.0%
Renter occupied
4.0%

Lifestyle & Demographics

0
Walk score
0
0
Transit score
0
0
Bike score
0
248
Population
256
47
Median age
41

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

17
Schools nearby
18
980
Avg ICSEA
977

Climate

Annual rainfall
Mean max (Jan)

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).