Side by sideSuburb comparison

Dwarda vs Wandering.

Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk. Dwarda edges out on more headline metrics in this comparison.

On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Dwarda (992) sits above Wandering (982). Wandering skews owner-occupied (77%), Dwarda runs more rental-dense (38% owner).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.

For investors

Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.

For families

Dwarda edges out on average school ICSEA (992 vs 982). Dwarda also has a higher family-household share (88% vs 75%), so the catchment community skews family-heavy.

Common questionsDwarda vs Wandering

Common questions

Does Dwarda or Wandering have better schools?

On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Dwarda scores 992 vs 982 in Wandering. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.

The numbers behind the take

Dwarda
Metric
Wandering

Price & Market

Median house
Median unit
+0.0%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
Days on market

Rental

$200/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$200/wk
$180/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$200/wk
38.0%
Owner occupied
77.0%
Renter occupied
13.0%

Lifestyle & Demographics

0
Walk score
0
0
Transit score
0
0
Bike score
0
30
Population
391
52
Median age
50

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

3
Schools nearby
2
992
Avg ICSEA
982

Climate

724 mm
Annual rainfall
724 mm
31.4°C
Mean max (Jan)
31.4°C

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).