Side by sideSuburb comparison

East Hills vs Voyager Point.

Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk. Voyager Point edges out on more headline metrics in this comparison.

On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Voyager Point (1047) sits above East Hills (1040). Voyager Point skews owner-occupied (77%), East Hills runs more rental-dense (64% owner).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.

For investors

Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.

For families

Voyager Point edges out on average school ICSEA (1047 vs 1040). Voyager Point also has a higher family-household share (93% vs 71%), so the catchment community skews family-heavy.

Common questionsEast Hills vs Voyager Point

Common questions

Does East Hills or Voyager Point have better schools?

On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Voyager Point scores 1047 vs 1040 in East Hills. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.

The numbers behind the take

East Hills
Metric
Voyager Point

Price & Market

Median house
Median unit
+0.0%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
Days on market

Rental

$470/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$369/wk
$375/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$325/wk
64.0%
Owner occupied
77.0%
34.0%
Renter occupied
20.0%

Lifestyle & Demographics

0
Walk score
0
10
Transit score
0
100
Bike score
100
3,370
Population
1,678
41
Median age
37

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

20
Schools nearby
20
1040
Avg ICSEA
1047

Climate

1302 mm
Annual rainfall
1302 mm
26.0°C
Mean max (Jan)
26.0°C

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).