Side by sideSuburb comparison

Eastwood vs Rose Park.

Comparing two suburbs with median house prices of $1,420,000 and $3,115,000. Eastwood edges out on more headline metrics in this comparison.

Eastwood (median $1,420,000) is roughly 54% cheaper to buy into than Rose Park ($3,115,000). Over the past year, Rose Park (+15.4%) ran 10.9 percentage points ahead of Eastwood (+4.5%) on house-price growth.

Eastwood scores higher on walkability (88/100 vs 44/100 ), useful if you're optimising for a car-light household. On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Eastwood (1127) sits above Rose Park (1116).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

Eastwood is the lower entry point at $1,420,000 median, 54% below the other suburb. For first home buyers, that translates to a smaller deposit and lower stamp duty bill.

For investors

Investors face a yield-versus-growth split: Eastwood delivers the better gross yield (3.66% vs 1.50%), but Rose Park has run faster on capital growth this year. The right pick depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow or capital appreciation.

For families

Eastwood edges out on average school ICSEA (1127 vs 1116). Rose Park also has a higher family-household share (71% vs 50%), so the catchment community skews family-heavy.

Common questionsEastwood vs Rose Park

Common questions

Is Eastwood or Rose Park cheaper to buy in?

Eastwood has the lower median house price at $1,420,000, roughly 54% below Rose Park ($3,115,000). The gap on units is usually similar but worth checking on the full suburb profiles.

Which has stronger property growth, Eastwood or Rose Park?

Over the past 12 months, Rose Park grew +15.4% vs +4.5% in Eastwood, a gap of 10.9 percentage points. Twelve-month growth can swing year to year, so weight long-run trends from the individual suburb profiles before making a buy decision.

Does Eastwood or Rose Park have better schools?

On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Eastwood scores 1127 vs 1116 in Rose Park. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.

Which is more walkable, Eastwood or Rose Park?

Eastwood scores 88/100 on walkability vs 44/100. Above 70 is considered very walkable (most errands on foot), 50-69 is walkable for some errands, below 50 typically requires a car for daily life.

Which suburb has higher rental yield, Eastwood or Rose Park?

Gross rental yield on houses is 3.66% in Eastwood vs 1.50% in Rose Park. Gross yield equals annual rent divided by purchase price. Net yield (after strata, rates, insurance, agent fees and maintenance) typically runs 1.5-2 percentage points lower.

The numbers behind the take

Eastwood
Metric
Rose Park

Price & Market

$1,420,000
Median house
$3,115,000
$329,040
Median unit
$340,560
+4.5%
Annual growth (house)
+15.4%
Days on market

Rental

$1000/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$900/wk
$722/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$520/wk
63.0%
Owner occupied
71.0%
35.0%
Renter occupied
26.0%

Lifestyle & Demographics

88
Walk score
44
0
Transit score
0
100
Bike score
100
712
Population
1,375
48
Median age
44

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

20
Schools nearby
20
1127
Avg ICSEA
1116

Climate

448 mm
Annual rainfall
448 mm
27.9°C
Mean max (Jan)
27.9°C

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).