Side by sideSuburb comparison

Elingamite North vs Ecklin South.

Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk. Ecklin South edges out on more headline metrics in this comparison.

On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Ecklin South (969) sits above Elingamite North (932). Elingamite North skews owner-occupied (84%), Ecklin South runs more rental-dense (59% owner).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.

For investors

Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.

For families

Ecklin South edges out on average school ICSEA (969 vs 932). Elingamite North also has a higher family-household share (103% vs 78%), so the catchment community skews family-heavy.

Common questionsElingamite North vs Ecklin South

Common questions

Does Elingamite North or Ecklin South have better schools?

On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Ecklin South scores 969 vs 932 in Elingamite North. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.

The numbers behind the take

Elingamite North
Metric
Ecklin South

Price & Market

Median house
Median unit
+0.0%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
Days on market

Rental

$220/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$200/wk
$150/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$200/wk
84.0%
Owner occupied
59.0%
19.0%
Renter occupied
24.0%

Lifestyle & Demographics

0
Walk score
0
0
Transit score
0
0
Bike score
0
118
Population
222
35
Median age
34

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

3
Schools nearby
7
932
Avg ICSEA
969

Climate

Annual rainfall
Mean max (Jan)

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).