Side by sideSuburb comparison

Emu Vale vs Mount Sturt.

Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk. Emu Vale edges out on more headline metrics in this comparison.

On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Emu Vale (973) sits above Mount Sturt (953). Emu Vale skews owner-occupied (93%), Mount Sturt runs more rental-dense (50% owner).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.

For investors

Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.

For families

Emu Vale edges out on average school ICSEA (973 vs 953). Emu Vale also has a higher family-household share (70% vs 50%), so the catchment community skews family-heavy.

Common questionsEmu Vale vs Mount Sturt

Common questions

Does Emu Vale or Mount Sturt have better schools?

On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Emu Vale scores 973 vs 953 in Mount Sturt. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.

The numbers behind the take

Emu Vale
Metric
Mount Sturt

Price & Market

Median house
Median unit
+0.0%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
Days on market

Rental

$235/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$260/wk
$200/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$400/wk
93.0%
Owner occupied
50.0%
4.0%
Renter occupied

Lifestyle & Demographics

0
Walk score
0
0
Transit score
0
0
Bike score
0
161
Population
14
60
Median age
51

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

7
Schools nearby
14
973
Avg ICSEA
953

Climate

Annual rainfall
Mean max (Jan)

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).