Side by sideSuburb comparison

Eumemmerring vs Dandenong South.

Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk. Eumemmerring edges out on more headline metrics in this comparison.

On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Eumemmerring (972) sits above Dandenong South (956). Eumemmerring skews owner-occupied (54%), Dandenong South runs more rental-dense (17% owner).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.

For investors

Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.

For families

Eumemmerring edges out on average school ICSEA (972 vs 956). Eumemmerring also has a higher family-household share (65% vs 24%), so the catchment community skews family-heavy.

Common questionsEumemmerring vs Dandenong South

Common questions

Does Eumemmerring or Dandenong South have better schools?

On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Eumemmerring scores 972 vs 956 in Dandenong South. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.

The numbers behind the take

Eumemmerring
Metric
Dandenong South

Price & Market

$720,000
Median house
$607,500
Median unit
+0.0%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
Days on market

Rental

$320/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$321/wk
$323/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$245/wk
54.0%
Owner occupied
17.0%
38.0%
Renter occupied
69.0%

Lifestyle & Demographics

44
Walk score
44
0
Transit score
40
100
Bike score
100
2,285
Population
125
35
Median age
51

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

20
Schools nearby
20
972
Avg ICSEA
956

Climate

639 mm
Annual rainfall
639 mm
25.9°C
Mean max (Jan)
25.9°C

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).