Side by sideSuburb comparison

Farley vs Mount Dee.

Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk. Mount Dee edges out on more headline metrics in this comparison.

On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Mount Dee (990) sits above Farley (988). Mount Dee skews owner-occupied (67%), Farley runs more rental-dense (47% owner).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.

For investors

Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.

For families

Mount Dee edges out on average school ICSEA (990 vs 988). Mount Dee also has a higher family-household share (100% vs 79%), so the catchment community skews family-heavy.

Common questionsFarley vs Mount Dee

Common questions

Does Farley or Mount Dee have better schools?

On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Mount Dee scores 990 vs 988 in Farley. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.

The numbers behind the take

Farley
Metric
Mount Dee

Price & Market

Median house
Median unit
+0.0%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
Days on market

Rental

$373/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$373/wk
$440/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$317/wk
47.0%
Owner occupied
67.0%
50.0%
Renter occupied

Lifestyle & Demographics

0
Walk score
0
0
Transit score
0
100
Bike score
100
605
Population
14
30
Median age
60

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

20
Schools nearby
20
988
Avg ICSEA
990

Climate

1143 mm
Annual rainfall
1143 mm
24.7°C
Mean max (Jan)
24.7°C

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).