Side by sideSuburb comparison

Farrell Flat vs Hanson.

Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk. Farrell Flat edges out on more headline metrics in this comparison.

On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Farrell Flat (1001) sits above Hanson (989). Hanson skews owner-occupied (167%), Farrell Flat runs more rental-dense (77% owner).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.

For investors

Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.

For families

Farrell Flat edges out on average school ICSEA (1001 vs 989). Hanson also has a higher family-household share (133% vs 72%), so the catchment community skews family-heavy.

Common questionsFarrell Flat vs Hanson

Common questions

Does Farrell Flat or Hanson have better schools?

On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Farrell Flat scores 1001 vs 989 in Hanson. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.

The numbers behind the take

Farrell Flat
Metric
Hanson

Price & Market

Median house
Median unit
+0.0%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
Days on market

Rental

$300/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$183/wk
$200/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$208/wk
77.0%
Owner occupied
167.0%
20.0%
Renter occupied

Lifestyle & Demographics

0
Walk score
0
0
Transit score
0
0
Bike score
0
201
Population
23
50
Median age
53

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

3
Schools nearby
13
1001
Avg ICSEA
989

Climate

Annual rainfall
Mean max (Jan)

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).