Side by sideSuburb comparison

Fernhill vs Towradgi.

Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk. Towradgi edges out on more headline metrics in this comparison.

Towradgi scores higher on walkability (4/100 vs 14/100 ), useful if you're optimising for a car-light household. Towradgi skews owner-occupied (63%), Fernhill runs more rental-dense (45% owner).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.

For investors

Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.

For families

School and household data is too similar between the two to call a winner on family fit. Check the individual profiles for street-level school catchments.

Common questionsFernhill vs Towradgi

Common questions

Which is more walkable, Fernhill or Towradgi?

Towradgi scores 14/100 on walkability vs 4/100. Above 70 is considered very walkable (most errands on foot), 50-69 is walkable for some errands, below 50 typically requires a car for daily life.

The numbers behind the take

Fernhill
Metric
Towradgi

Price & Market

Median house
Median unit
+0.0%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
Days on market

Rental

$400/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$340/wk
$190/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$350/wk
45.0%
Owner occupied
63.0%
50.0%
Renter occupied
31.0%

Lifestyle & Demographics

4
Walk score
14
0
Transit score
20
100
Bike score
100
987
Population
3,241
45
Median age
42

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

20
Schools nearby
20
1019
Avg ICSEA
1019

Climate

Annual rainfall
Mean max (Jan)

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).