Side by sideSuburb comparison

Ficks Crossing vs Wheatlands.

Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk. Wheatlands edges out on more headline metrics in this comparison.

On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Wheatlands (851) sits above Ficks Crossing (809). Ficks Crossing skews owner-occupied (114%), Wheatlands runs more rental-dense (64% owner).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.

For investors

Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.

For families

Wheatlands edges out on average school ICSEA (851 vs 809). Ficks Crossing also has a higher family-household share (86% vs 68%), so the catchment community skews family-heavy.

Common questionsFicks Crossing vs Wheatlands

Common questions

Does Ficks Crossing or Wheatlands have better schools?

On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Wheatlands scores 851 vs 809 in Ficks Crossing. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.

The numbers behind the take

Ficks Crossing
Metric
Wheatlands

Price & Market

Median house
Median unit
+0.0%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
Days on market

Rental

$220/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$220/wk
$220/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$200/wk
114.0%
Owner occupied
64.0%
Renter occupied
11.0%

Lifestyle & Demographics

0
Walk score
0
0
Transit score
0
0
Bike score
0
39
Population
82
54
Median age
49

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

7
Schools nearby
11
809
Avg ICSEA
851

Climate

Annual rainfall
Mean max (Jan)

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).