Fisher vs Marks Landing
On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Fisher (953) sits above Marks Landing (937). Fisher skews owner-occupied (82%), Marks Landing runs more rental-dense (58% owner).
Buying in Fisher or Marks Landing?
Selling in Fisher? The free selling guide
Fisher and Marks Landing side by side
| Measure | Fisher | Marks Landing |
|---|---|---|
| Renting | ||
| Owner occupied | 82.0% | 58.0% |
| Schools | ||
| Schools nearby | 2 | 3 |
| Average ICSEA | 953 | 937 |
| Lifestyle and people | ||
| Walk score | 0 | 0 |
| Transit score | 0 | 0 |
| Bike score | 0 | 0 |
| Population | 61 | 63 |
| Median age | 59 | 67 |
| Climate | ||
| Annual rainfall | 273 mm | 274 mm |
| Mean max, January | 31.9°C | 31.9°C |
Green dot: better on that measure (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk). Each suburb’s profile gives the source and period of its figures.
Which suits whom
- For buyers
- We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.
- For investors
- Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.
- For families
- Fisher edges out on average school ICSEA (953 vs 937). Marks Landing also has a higher family-household share (83% vs 41%), so the catchment community skews family-heavy.
Fisher vs Marks Landing: common questions
Does Fisher or Marks Landing have better schools?
On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Fisher scores 953 vs 937 in Marks Landing. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.
Keep comparing
The two suburbs
Compare Fisher with
Choosing between Fisher and Marks Landing?
The free buying guide: budget, schemes, inspections and how not to overpay.