Side by sideSuburb comparison

Flint vs Mount Cooke.

Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk. Flint edges out on more headline metrics in this comparison.

On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Flint (1009) sits above Mount Cooke (991).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.

For investors

Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.

For families

Flint edges out on average school ICSEA (1009 vs 991).

Common questionsFlint vs Mount Cooke

Common questions

Does Flint or Mount Cooke have better schools?

On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Flint scores 1009 vs 991 in Mount Cooke. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.

The numbers behind the take

Flint
Metric
Mount Cooke

Price & Market

Median house
Median unit
+0.0%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
Days on market

Rental

$260/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$280/wk
$221/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$238/wk
Owner occupied
Renter occupied

Lifestyle & Demographics

0
Walk score
0
0
Transit score
0
0
Bike score
0
3,485
Population
1,673
24
Median age
42

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

5
Schools nearby
20
1009
Avg ICSEA
991

Climate

777 mm
Annual rainfall
724 mm
31.7°C
Mean max (Jan)
31.4°C

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).