Side by sideSuburb comparison

Forest Grove vs Warner Glen.

Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk. Forest Grove edges out on more headline metrics in this comparison.

On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Forest Grove (1044) sits above Warner Glen (1038).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.

For investors

Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.

For families

Forest Grove edges out on average school ICSEA (1044 vs 1038). Warner Glen also has a higher family-household share (89% vs 58%), so the catchment community skews family-heavy.

Common questionsForest Grove vs Warner Glen

Common questions

Does Forest Grove or Warner Glen have better schools?

On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Forest Grove scores 1044 vs 1038 in Warner Glen. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.

The numbers behind the take

Forest Grove
Metric
Warner Glen

Price & Market

Median house
Median unit
+0.0%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
Days on market

Rental

$300/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$258/wk
$250/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$250/wk
54.0%
Owner occupied
58.0%
31.0%
Renter occupied
32.0%

Lifestyle & Demographics

0
Walk score
0
0
Transit score
0
0
Bike score
0
253
Population
63
52
Median age
49

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

7
Schools nearby
9
1044
Avg ICSEA
1038

Climate

Annual rainfall
Mean max (Jan)

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).