Side by sideSuburb comparison

Forster Shopping Village vs Coomba Park.

Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk. Forster Shopping Village edges out on more headline metrics in this comparison.

Forster Shopping Village scores higher on walkability (40/100 vs 0/100 ), useful if you're optimising for a car-light household.

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.

For investors

Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.

For families

School and household data is too similar between the two to call a winner on family fit. Check the individual profiles for street-level school catchments.

Common questionsForster Shopping Village vs Coomba Park

Common questions

Which is more walkable, Forster Shopping Village or Coomba Park?

Forster Shopping Village scores 40/100 on walkability vs 0/100. Above 70 is considered very walkable (most errands on foot), 50-69 is walkable for some errands, below 50 typically requires a car for daily life.

The numbers behind the take

Forster Shopping Village
Metric
Coomba Park

Price & Market

Median house
Median unit
+0.0%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
Days on market

Rental

$330/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$330/wk
$281/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$300/wk
Owner occupied
84.0%
Renter occupied
11.0%

Lifestyle & Demographics

40
Walk score
0
30
Transit score
0
75
Bike score
0
25,187
Population
691
58
Median age
61

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

6
Schools nearby
6
959
Avg ICSEA
959

Climate

Annual rainfall
1143 mm
Mean max (Jan)
24.7°C

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).