Side by sideSuburb comparison

Frogmore vs Taylors Flat.

Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk. Frogmore edges out on more headline metrics in this comparison.

On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Frogmore (978) sits above Taylors Flat (940). Taylors Flat skews owner-occupied (117%), Frogmore runs more rental-dense (78% owner).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.

For investors

Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.

For families

Frogmore edges out on average school ICSEA (978 vs 940).

Common questionsFrogmore vs Taylors Flat

Common questions

Does Frogmore or Taylors Flat have better schools?

On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Frogmore scores 978 vs 940 in Taylors Flat. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.

The numbers behind the take

Frogmore
Metric
Taylors Flat

Price & Market

Median house
Median unit
+0.0%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
Days on market

Rental

$240/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$240/wk
$40/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$204/wk
78.0%
Owner occupied
117.0%
16.0%
Renter occupied

Lifestyle & Demographics

0
Walk score
0
Transit score
0
Bike score
146
Population
58
48
Median age
57

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

4
Schools nearby
4
978
Avg ICSEA
940

Climate

Annual rainfall
Mean max (Jan)

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).