Side by sideSuburb comparison

Frogs Hollow vs Wolumla.

Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk.

Wolumla scores higher on walkability (0/100 vs 2/100 ), useful if you're optimising for a car-light household. On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Frogs Hollow (994) sits above Wolumla (988).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.

For investors

Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.

For families

Frogs Hollow edges out on average school ICSEA (994 vs 988).

Common questionsFrogs Hollow vs Wolumla

Common questions

Does Frogs Hollow or Wolumla have better schools?

On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Frogs Hollow scores 994 vs 988 in Wolumla. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.

Which is more walkable, Frogs Hollow or Wolumla?

Wolumla scores 2/100 on walkability vs 0/100. Above 70 is considered very walkable (most errands on foot), 50-69 is walkable for some errands, below 50 typically requires a car for daily life.

The numbers behind the take

Frogs Hollow
Metric
Wolumla

Price & Market

Median house
Median unit
+0.0%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
Days on market

Rental

$300/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$300/wk
$290/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$318/wk
84.0%
Owner occupied
88.0%
8.0%
Renter occupied
8.0%

Lifestyle & Demographics

0
Walk score
2
0
Transit score
0
0
Bike score
0
117
Population
767
40
Median age
45

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

5
Schools nearby
15
994
Avg ICSEA
988

Climate

Annual rainfall
Mean max (Jan)

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).