Side by sideSuburb comparison

Fulham vs Kilmany.

Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk. Kilmany edges out on more headline metrics in this comparison.

On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Kilmany (980) sits above Fulham (957).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.

For investors

Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.

For families

Kilmany edges out on average school ICSEA (980 vs 957).

Common questionsFulham vs Kilmany

Common questions

Does Fulham or Kilmany have better schools?

On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Kilmany scores 980 vs 957 in Fulham. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.

The numbers behind the take

Fulham
Metric
Kilmany

Price & Market

Median house
Median unit
+0.0%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
Days on market

Rental

$205/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$205/wk
$174/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$210/wk
Owner occupied
89.0%
Renter occupied
16.0%

Lifestyle & Demographics

0
Walk score
0
0
Transit score
0
0
Bike score
0
6,231
Population
165
47
Median age
45

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

4
Schools nearby
19
957
Avg ICSEA
980

Climate

Annual rainfall
Mean max (Jan)

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).