Side by sideSuburb comparison

Gawler River vs Ward Belt.

Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk. Ward Belt edges out on more headline metrics in this comparison.

On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Ward Belt (986) sits above Gawler River (975). Gawler River skews owner-occupied (85%), Ward Belt runs more rental-dense (68% owner).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.

For investors

Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.

For families

Ward Belt edges out on average school ICSEA (986 vs 975). Gawler River also has a higher family-household share (91% vs 81%), so the catchment community skews family-heavy.

Common questionsGawler River vs Ward Belt

Common questions

Does Gawler River or Ward Belt have better schools?

On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Ward Belt scores 986 vs 975 in Gawler River. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.

The numbers behind the take

Gawler River
Metric
Ward Belt

Price & Market

Median house
Median unit
+0.0%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
Days on market

Rental

$280/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$280/wk
$320/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$425/wk
85.0%
Owner occupied
68.0%
24.0%
Renter occupied
9.0%

Lifestyle & Demographics

Walk score
0
Transit score
0
Bike score
5
104
Population
158
46
Median age
45

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

20
Schools nearby
19
975
Avg ICSEA
986

Climate

448 mm
Annual rainfall
448 mm
27.9°C
Mean max (Jan)
27.9°C

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).