Side by sideSuburb comparison

Georges Creek vs Camerons Creek.

Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk. Camerons Creek edges out on more headline metrics in this comparison.

On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Camerons Creek (848) sits above Georges Creek (847). Georges Creek skews owner-occupied (100%), Camerons Creek runs more rental-dense (67% owner).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.

For investors

Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.

For families

Camerons Creek edges out on average school ICSEA (848 vs 847). Georges Creek also has a higher family-household share (167% vs 75%), so the catchment community skews family-heavy.

Common questionsGeorges Creek vs Camerons Creek

Common questions

Does Georges Creek or Camerons Creek have better schools?

On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Camerons Creek scores 848 vs 847 in Georges Creek. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.

The numbers behind the take

Georges Creek
Metric
Camerons Creek

Price & Market

Median house
Median unit
+0.0%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
Days on market

Rental

$250/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$190/wk
$213/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$175/wk
100.0%
Owner occupied
67.0%
Renter occupied

Lifestyle & Demographics

0
Walk score
0
0
Transit score
0
0
Bike score
0
11
Population
29
58
Median age
35

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

4
Schools nearby
3
847
Avg ICSEA
848

Climate

Annual rainfall
Mean max (Jan)

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).