Side by sideSuburb comparison

Gheringhap vs Sutherlands Creek.

Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk. Gheringhap edges out on more headline metrics in this comparison.

On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Gheringhap (1038) sits above Sutherlands Creek (1018). Gheringhap skews owner-occupied (89%), Sutherlands Creek runs more rental-dense (76% owner).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.

For investors

Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.

For families

Gheringhap edges out on average school ICSEA (1038 vs 1018). Sutherlands Creek also has a higher family-household share (86% vs 71%), so the catchment community skews family-heavy.

Common questionsGheringhap vs Sutherlands Creek

Common questions

Does Gheringhap or Sutherlands Creek have better schools?

On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Gheringhap scores 1038 vs 1018 in Sutherlands Creek. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.

The numbers behind the take

Gheringhap
Metric
Sutherlands Creek

Price & Market

Median house
Median unit
+0.0%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
Days on market

Rental

$390/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$390/wk
$460/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$175/wk
89.0%
Owner occupied
76.0%
13.0%
Renter occupied
8.0%

Lifestyle & Demographics

Walk score
0
Transit score
0
Bike score
0
132
Population
129
49
Median age
41

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

7
Schools nearby
2
1038
Avg ICSEA
1018

Climate

612 mm
Annual rainfall
612 mm
25.3°C
Mean max (Jan)
25.3°C

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).