Side by sideSuburb comparison

Gilgandra vs Bearbong.

Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk.

Bearbong skews owner-occupied (73%), Gilgandra runs more rental-dense (63% owner).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.

For investors

Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.

For families

Bearbong has a heavier family-household mix (77% vs 65%), which typically signals stronger demand for family-amenable infrastructure (parks, schools, supermarkets).

The numbers behind the take

Gilgandra
Metric
Bearbong

Price & Market

Median house
Median unit
+0.0%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
Days on market

Rental

$200/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$200/wk
$200/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$700/wk
63.0%
Owner occupied
73.0%
29.0%
Renter occupied
14.0%

Lifestyle & Demographics

0
Walk score
0
0
Transit score
0
0
Bike score
0
2,983
Population
72
47
Median age
38

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

3
Schools nearby
3
890
Avg ICSEA
890

Climate

414 mm
Annual rainfall
414 mm
33.5°C
Mean max (Jan)
33.5°C

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).