Side by sideSuburb comparison

Gillieston Heights vs Louth Park.

Comparing two suburbs with median house prices of $780,000 and $1,600,000. Gillieston Heights edges out on more headline metrics in this comparison.

Gillieston Heights (median $780,000) is roughly 51% cheaper to buy into than Louth Park ($1,600,000). Over the past year, Gillieston Heights (+11.4%) ran 3.3 percentage points ahead of Louth Park (+8.1%) on house-price growth.

Gillieston Heights scores higher on walkability (14/100 vs 0/100 ), useful if you're optimising for a car-light household. On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Louth Park (995) sits above Gillieston Heights (985). Louth Park skews owner-occupied (95%), Gillieston Heights runs more rental-dense (60% owner).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

Gillieston Heights is the lower entry point at $780,000 median, 51% below the other suburb. For first home buyers, that translates to a smaller deposit and lower stamp duty bill.

For investors

Gillieston Heights carries both higher gross yield (4.33% vs 2.08%) and stronger 12-month growth. On the headline numbers, it's the cleaner investor case of the two.

For families

Louth Park edges out on average school ICSEA (995 vs 985). Louth Park also has a higher family-household share (94% vs 79%), so the catchment community skews family-heavy.

Common questionsGillieston Heights vs Louth Park

Common questions

Is Gillieston Heights or Louth Park cheaper to buy in?

Gillieston Heights has the lower median house price at $780,000, roughly 51% below Louth Park ($1,600,000). The gap on units is usually similar but worth checking on the full suburb profiles.

Which has stronger property growth, Gillieston Heights or Louth Park?

Over the past 12 months, Gillieston Heights grew +11.4% vs +8.1% in Louth Park, a gap of 3.3 percentage points. Twelve-month growth can swing year to year, so weight long-run trends from the individual suburb profiles before making a buy decision.

Does Gillieston Heights or Louth Park have better schools?

On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Louth Park scores 995 vs 985 in Gillieston Heights. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.

Which is more walkable, Gillieston Heights or Louth Park?

Gillieston Heights scores 14/100 on walkability vs 0/100. Above 70 is considered very walkable (most errands on foot), 50-69 is walkable for some errands, below 50 typically requires a car for daily life.

Which suburb has higher rental yield, Gillieston Heights or Louth Park?

Gross rental yield on houses is 4.33% in Gillieston Heights vs 2.08% in Louth Park. Gross yield equals annual rent divided by purchase price. Net yield (after strata, rates, insurance, agent fees and maintenance) typically runs 1.5-2 percentage points lower.

The numbers behind the take

Gillieston Heights
Metric
Louth Park

Price & Market

$780,000
Median house
$1,600,000
$308,880
Median unit
$293,040
+11.4%
Annual growth (house)
+8.1%
Days on market

Rental

$650/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$640/wk
$520/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$495/wk
60.0%
Owner occupied
95.0%
38.0%
Renter occupied
6.0%

Lifestyle & Demographics

14
Walk score
0
0
Transit score
0
100
Bike score
85
4,796
Population
922
30
Median age
35

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

20
Schools nearby
20
985
Avg ICSEA
995

Climate

1143 mm
Annual rainfall
1143 mm
24.7°C
Mean max (Jan)
24.7°C

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).