Side by sideSuburb comparison

Gillieston vs Byrneside.

Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk. Gillieston edges out on more headline metrics in this comparison.

On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Gillieston (937) sits above Byrneside (928). Byrneside skews owner-occupied (76%), Gillieston runs more rental-dense (55% owner).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.

For investors

Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.

For families

Gillieston edges out on average school ICSEA (937 vs 928). Byrneside also has a higher family-household share (83% vs 70%), so the catchment community skews family-heavy.

Common questionsGillieston vs Byrneside

Common questions

Does Gillieston or Byrneside have better schools?

On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Gillieston scores 937 vs 928 in Byrneside. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.

The numbers behind the take

Gillieston
Metric
Byrneside

Price & Market

Median house
Median unit
+0.0%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
Days on market

Rental

$245/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$230/wk
$210/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$230/wk
55.0%
Owner occupied
76.0%
15.0%
Renter occupied
5.0%

Lifestyle & Demographics

0
Walk score
0
0
Transit score
0
0
Bike score
0
45
Population
161
49
Median age
46

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

20
Schools nearby
17
937
Avg ICSEA
928

Climate

422 mm
Annual rainfall
422 mm
29.8°C
Mean max (Jan)
29.8°C

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).