Side by sideSuburb comparison

Glass House Mountains vs Peachester.

Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk. Peachester edges out on more headline metrics in this comparison.

On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Peachester (997) sits above Glass House Mountains (984).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.

For investors

Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.

For families

Peachester edges out on average school ICSEA (997 vs 984).

Common questionsGlass House Mountains vs Peachester

Common questions

Does Glass House Mountains or Peachester have better schools?

On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Peachester scores 997 vs 984 in Glass House Mountains. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.

The numbers behind the take

Glass House Mountains
Metric
Peachester

Price & Market

Median house
Median unit
+0.0%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
Days on market

Rental

$790/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$390/wk
$400/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$325/wk
82.0%
Owner occupied
86.0%
16.0%
Renter occupied
11.0%

Lifestyle & Demographics

0
Walk score
0
0
Transit score
0
20
Bike score
0
5,601
Population
1,460
42
Median age
46

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

6
Schools nearby
7
984
Avg ICSEA
997

Climate

1068 mm
Annual rainfall
1068 mm
30.4°C
Mean max (Jan)
30.4°C

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).