Side by sideSuburb comparison

Golden Grove vs Salisbury Heights.

Comparing two suburbs with median house prices of $1,160,000 and $947,500. Golden Grove edges out on more headline metrics in this comparison.

Salisbury Heights (median $947,500) is roughly 22% cheaper to buy into than Golden Grove ($1,160,000). Over the past year, Golden Grove (+29.9%) ran 2.7 percentage points ahead of Salisbury Heights (+27.2%) on house-price growth.

Golden Grove scores higher on walkability (2/100 vs 0/100 ), useful if you're optimising for a car-light household. On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Golden Grove (1028) sits above Salisbury Heights (986). Salisbury Heights skews owner-occupied (86%), Golden Grove runs more rental-dense (75% owner).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

Salisbury Heights is the lower entry point at $947,500 median, 22% below the other suburb. For first home buyers, that translates to a smaller deposit and lower stamp duty bill.

For investors

Investors face a yield-versus-growth split: Salisbury Heights delivers the better gross yield (3.43% vs 2.96%), but Golden Grove has run faster on capital growth this year. The right pick depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow or capital appreciation.

For families

Golden Grove edges out on average school ICSEA (1028 vs 986).

Common questionsGolden Grove vs Salisbury Heights

Common questions

Is Golden Grove or Salisbury Heights cheaper to buy in?

Salisbury Heights has the lower median house price at $947,500, roughly 22% below Golden Grove ($1,160,000). The gap on units is usually similar but worth checking on the full suburb profiles.

Which has stronger property growth, Golden Grove or Salisbury Heights?

Over the past 12 months, Golden Grove grew +29.9% vs +27.2% in Salisbury Heights, a gap of 2.7 percentage points. Twelve-month growth can swing year to year, so weight long-run trends from the individual suburb profiles before making a buy decision.

Does Golden Grove or Salisbury Heights have better schools?

On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Golden Grove scores 1028 vs 986 in Salisbury Heights. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.

Which is more walkable, Golden Grove or Salisbury Heights?

Golden Grove scores 2/100 on walkability vs 0/100. Above 70 is considered very walkable (most errands on foot), 50-69 is walkable for some errands, below 50 typically requires a car for daily life.

Which suburb has higher rental yield, Golden Grove or Salisbury Heights?

Gross rental yield on houses is 3.43% in Salisbury Heights vs 2.96% in Golden Grove. Gross yield equals annual rent divided by purchase price. Net yield (after strata, rates, insurance, agent fees and maintenance) typically runs 1.5-2 percentage points lower.

The numbers behind the take

Golden Grove
Metric
Salisbury Heights

Price & Market

$1,160,000
Median house
$947,500
$259,200
Median unit
$205,920
+29.9%
Annual growth (house)
+27.2%
Days on market

Rental

$660/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$625/wk
$535/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$330/wk
75.0%
Owner occupied
86.0%
18.0%
Renter occupied
13.0%

Lifestyle & Demographics

2
Walk score
0
0
Transit score
0
100
Bike score
100
10,299
Population
4,488
44
Median age
38

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

20
Schools nearby
20
1028
Avg ICSEA
986

Climate

448 mm
Annual rainfall
448 mm
27.9°C
Mean max (Jan)
27.9°C

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).