Side by sideSuburb comparison

Gowan vs Lower Lewis Ponds.

Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk. Lower Lewis Ponds edges out on more headline metrics in this comparison.

On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Lower Lewis Ponds (968) sits above Gowan (965). Lower Lewis Ponds skews owner-occupied (94%), Gowan runs more rental-dense (80% owner).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.

For investors

Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.

For families

Lower Lewis Ponds edges out on average school ICSEA (968 vs 965). Gowan also has a higher family-household share (100% vs 63%), so the catchment community skews family-heavy.

Common questionsGowan vs Lower Lewis Ponds

Common questions

Does Gowan or Lower Lewis Ponds have better schools?

On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Lower Lewis Ponds scores 968 vs 965 in Gowan. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.

The numbers behind the take

Gowan
Metric
Lower Lewis Ponds

Price & Market

Median house
Median unit
+0.0%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
Days on market

Rental

$320/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$330/wk
$325/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$370/wk
80.0%
Owner occupied
94.0%
Renter occupied

Lifestyle & Demographics

0
Walk score
0
0
Transit score
0
0
Bike score
0
38
Population
40
59
Median age
43

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

20
Schools nearby
17
965
Avg ICSEA
968

Climate

Annual rainfall
Mean max (Jan)

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).