Side by sideSuburb comparison

Gracemere vs Port Curtis.

Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk.

Port Curtis skews owner-occupied (85%), Gracemere runs more rental-dense (59% owner).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.

For investors

Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.

For families

Gracemere has a heavier family-household mix (78% vs 61%), which typically signals stronger demand for family-amenable infrastructure (parks, schools, supermarkets).

The numbers behind the take

Gracemere
Metric
Port Curtis

Price & Market

Median house
Median unit
+0.0%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
Days on market

Rental

$530/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$265/wk
$340/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$250/wk
59.0%
Owner occupied
85.0%
39.0%
Renter occupied
12.0%

Lifestyle & Demographics

0
Walk score
0
0
Transit score
0
0
Bike score
0
12,023
Population
309
32
Median age
41

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

12
Schools nearby
20
939
Avg ICSEA
939

Climate

Annual rainfall
Mean max (Jan)

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).