Side by sideSuburb comparison

Grange vs Kirkcaldy.

Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk.

Kirkcaldy scores higher on walkability (24/100 vs 36/100 ), useful if you're optimising for a car-light household.

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.

For investors

Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.

For families

School and household data is too similar between the two to call a winner on family fit. Check the individual profiles for street-level school catchments.

Common questionsGrange vs Kirkcaldy

Common questions

Which is more walkable, Grange or Kirkcaldy?

Kirkcaldy scores 36/100 on walkability vs 24/100. Above 70 is considered very walkable (most errands on foot), 50-69 is walkable for some errands, below 50 typically requires a car for daily life.

The numbers behind the take

Grange
Metric
Kirkcaldy

Price & Market

$1,737,500
Median house
$316,800
Median unit
+19.4%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
Days on market

Rental

$825/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$340/wk
$557/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$289/wk
71.0%
Owner occupied
24.0%
Renter occupied

Lifestyle & Demographics

24
Walk score
36
0
Transit score
0
100
Bike score
100
6,143
Population
16,343
49
Median age
47

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

20
Schools nearby
20
1048
Avg ICSEA
1048

Climate

448 mm
Annual rainfall
448 mm
27.9°C
Mean max (Jan)
27.9°C

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).