Side by sideSuburb comparison

Grass Patch vs Wittenoom Hills.

Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk. Grass Patch edges out on more headline metrics in this comparison.

On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Grass Patch (1024) sits above Wittenoom Hills (851). Wittenoom Hills skews owner-occupied (100%), Grass Patch runs more rental-dense (65% owner).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.

For investors

Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.

For families

Grass Patch edges out on average school ICSEA (1024 vs 851). Wittenoom Hills also has a higher family-household share (100% vs 75%), so the catchment community skews family-heavy.

Common questionsGrass Patch vs Wittenoom Hills

Common questions

Does Grass Patch or Wittenoom Hills have better schools?

On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Grass Patch scores 1024 vs 851 in Wittenoom Hills. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.

The numbers behind the take

Grass Patch
Metric
Wittenoom Hills

Price & Market

Median house
Median unit
+0.0%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
Days on market

Rental

$140/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$115/wk
$140/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$98/wk
65.0%
Owner occupied
100.0%
6.0%
Renter occupied

Lifestyle & Demographics

0
Walk score
0
0
Transit score
0
0
Bike score
0
113
Population
16
42
Median age
41

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

2
Schools nearby
2
1024
Avg ICSEA
851

Climate

Annual rainfall
Mean max (Jan)

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).