Side by sideSuburb comparison

Great Marlow vs Carrs Peninsula.

Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk.

Carrs Peninsula skews owner-occupied (250%), Great Marlow runs more rental-dense (76% owner).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.

For investors

Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.

For families

Carrs Peninsula has a heavier family-household mix (200% vs 73%), which typically signals stronger demand for family-amenable infrastructure (parks, schools, supermarkets).

The numbers behind the take

Great Marlow
Metric
Carrs Peninsula

Price & Market

Median house
Median unit
+0.0%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
Days on market

Rental

$300/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$300/wk
$345/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$293/wk
76.0%
Owner occupied
250.0%
21.0%
Renter occupied

Lifestyle & Demographics

0
Walk score
0
0
Transit score
0
0
Bike score
0
184
Population
17
50
Median age
52

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

13
Schools nearby
13
930
Avg ICSEA
930

Climate

Annual rainfall
Mean max (Jan)

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).