Side by sideSuburb comparison

Gredgwin vs Catumnal.

Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk. Catumnal edges out on more headline metrics in this comparison.

On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Catumnal (984) sits above Gredgwin (968). Gredgwin skews owner-occupied (120%), Catumnal runs more rental-dense (57% owner).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.

For investors

Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.

For families

Catumnal edges out on average school ICSEA (984 vs 968).

Common questionsGredgwin vs Catumnal

Common questions

Does Gredgwin or Catumnal have better schools?

On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Catumnal scores 984 vs 968 in Gredgwin. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.

The numbers behind the take

Gredgwin
Metric
Catumnal

Price & Market

Median house
Median unit
+0.0%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
Days on market

Rental

$180/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$180/wk
$153/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$153/wk
120.0%
Owner occupied
57.0%
Renter occupied

Lifestyle & Demographics

0
Walk score
0
0
Transit score
0
0
Bike score
0
13
Population
14
47
Median age
35

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

7
Schools nearby
5
968
Avg ICSEA
984

Climate

Annual rainfall
422 mm
Mean max (Jan)
29.8°C

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).