Side by sideSuburb comparison

Greenhill vs Kempsey.

Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk.

Greenhill skews owner-occupied (64%), Kempsey runs more rental-dense (45% owner).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.

For investors

Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.

For families

Greenhill has a heavier family-household mix (75% vs 51%), which typically signals stronger demand for family-amenable infrastructure (parks, schools, supermarkets).

The numbers behind the take

Greenhill
Metric
Kempsey

Price & Market

Median house
Median unit
+0.0%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
Days on market

Rental

$295/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$295/wk
$240/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$253/wk
64.0%
Owner occupied
45.0%
29.0%
Renter occupied
52.0%

Lifestyle & Demographics

0
Walk score
0
Transit score
30
Bike score
757
Population
483
42
Median age
43

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

12
Schools nearby
12
863
Avg ICSEA
863

Climate

Annual rainfall
Mean max (Jan)

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).