Side by sideSuburb comparison

Griffith vs Narrabundah.

Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk. Griffith edges out on more headline metrics in this comparison.

Griffith scores higher on walkability (100/100 vs 54/100 ), useful if you're optimising for a car-light household.

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.

For investors

Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.

For families

School and household data is too similar between the two to call a winner on family fit. Check the individual profiles for street-level school catchments.

Common questionsGriffith vs Narrabundah

Common questions

Which is more walkable, Griffith or Narrabundah?

Griffith scores 100/100 on walkability vs 54/100. Above 70 is considered very walkable (most errands on foot), 50-69 is walkable for some errands, below 50 typically requires a car for daily life.

The numbers behind the take

Griffith
Metric
Narrabundah

Price & Market

Median house
$1,387,500
Median unit
$655,000
+0.0%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
Days on market

Rental

$481/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$500/wk
$462/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$440/wk
57.0%
Owner occupied
59.0%
40.0%
Renter occupied
36.0%

Lifestyle & Demographics

100
Walk score
54
80
Transit score
100
100
Bike score
100
5,328
Population
6,455
38
Median age
40

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

20
Schools nearby
20
1116
Avg ICSEA
1116

Climate

Annual rainfall
Mean max (Jan)

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).