Side by sideSuburb comparison

Gulmarrad vs Taloumbi.

Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk. Taloumbi edges out on more headline metrics in this comparison.

On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Taloumbi (968) sits above Gulmarrad (963). Gulmarrad skews owner-occupied (93%), Taloumbi runs more rental-dense (83% owner).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.

For investors

Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.

For families

Taloumbi edges out on average school ICSEA (968 vs 963).

Common questionsGulmarrad vs Taloumbi

Common questions

Does Gulmarrad or Taloumbi have better schools?

On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Taloumbi scores 968 vs 963 in Gulmarrad. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.

The numbers behind the take

Gulmarrad
Metric
Taloumbi

Price & Market

Median house
Median unit
+0.0%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
Days on market

Rental

$340/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$340/wk
$450/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$325/wk
93.0%
Owner occupied
83.0%
5.0%
Renter occupied
10.0%

Lifestyle & Demographics

0
Walk score
0
0
Transit score
0
5
Bike score
0
1,950
Population
96
49
Median age
47

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

7
Schools nearby
4
963
Avg ICSEA
968

Climate

Annual rainfall
Mean max (Jan)

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).