Side by sideSuburb comparison

Gunn vs Gray.

Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk.

Gunn skews owner-occupied (57%), Gray runs more rental-dense (47% owner).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.

For investors

Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.

For families

Gunn has a heavier family-household mix (81% vs 64%), which typically signals stronger demand for family-amenable infrastructure (parks, schools, supermarkets).

The numbers behind the take

Gunn
Metric
Gray

Price & Market

Median house
$390,000
Median unit
$250,000
+0.0%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
Days on market

Rental

$420/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$370/wk
$480/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$300/wk
57.0%
Owner occupied
47.0%
40.0%
Renter occupied
50.0%

Lifestyle & Demographics

6
Walk score
0
Transit score
100
Bike score
2,564
Population
3,142
31
Median age
34

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

16
Schools nearby
16
943
Avg ICSEA
943

Climate

1705 mm
Annual rainfall
1705 mm
31.8°C
Mean max (Jan)
31.8°C

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).