Side by sideSuburb comparison

Gymea vs Kareela.

Comparing two suburbs with median house prices of $1,842,000 and $1,741,000. Kareela edges out on more headline metrics in this comparison.

Kareela (median $1,741,000) is roughly 6% cheaper to buy into than Gymea ($1,842,000). Over the past year, Kareela (+7.1%) ran 5.9 percentage points ahead of Gymea (+1.2%) on house-price growth.

Gymea scores higher on walkability (42/100 vs 16/100 ), useful if you're optimising for a car-light household. On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Kareela (1077) sits above Gymea (1075). Kareela skews owner-occupied (95%), Gymea runs more rental-dense (66% owner).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

Kareela is the lower entry point at $1,741,000 median, 6% below the other suburb. For first home buyers, that translates to a smaller deposit and lower stamp duty bill.

For investors

Kareela carries both higher gross yield (2.99% vs 2.87%) and stronger 12-month growth. On the headline numbers, it's the cleaner investor case of the two.

For families

Kareela edges out on average school ICSEA (1077 vs 1075). Kareela also has a higher family-household share (87% vs 71%), so the catchment community skews family-heavy.

Common questionsGymea vs Kareela

Common questions

Is Gymea or Kareela cheaper to buy in?

Kareela has the lower median house price at $1,741,000, roughly 6% below Gymea ($1,842,000). The gap on units is usually similar but worth checking on the full suburb profiles.

Which has stronger property growth, Gymea or Kareela?

Over the past 12 months, Kareela grew +7.1% vs +1.2% in Gymea, a gap of 5.9 percentage points. Twelve-month growth can swing year to year, so weight long-run trends from the individual suburb profiles before making a buy decision.

Does Gymea or Kareela have better schools?

On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Kareela scores 1077 vs 1075 in Gymea. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.

Which is more walkable, Gymea or Kareela?

Gymea scores 42/100 on walkability vs 16/100. Above 70 is considered very walkable (most errands on foot), 50-69 is walkable for some errands, below 50 typically requires a car for daily life.

Which suburb has higher rental yield, Gymea or Kareela?

Gross rental yield on houses is 2.99% in Kareela vs 2.87% in Gymea. Gross yield equals annual rent divided by purchase price. Net yield (after strata, rates, insurance, agent fees and maintenance) typically runs 1.5-2 percentage points lower.

The numbers behind the take

Gymea
Metric
Kareela

Price & Market

$1,842,000
Median house
$1,741,000
$446,400
Median unit
$396,000
+1.2%
Annual growth (house)
+7.1%
Days on market

Rental

$1015/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$1000/wk
$750/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$700/wk
66.0%
Owner occupied
95.0%
32.0%
Renter occupied
5.0%

Lifestyle & Demographics

42
Walk score
16
20
Transit score
0
100
Bike score
85
8,219
Population
3,572
39
Median age
42

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

20
Schools nearby
20
1075
Avg ICSEA
1077

Climate

1302 mm
Annual rainfall
1302 mm
26.0°C
Mean max (Jan)
26.0°C

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).