Side by sideSuburb comparison

Hawkesbury Heights vs Valley Heights.

Comparing two suburbs with median house prices of $1,425,000 and $1,030,000. Valley Heights edges out on more headline metrics in this comparison.

Valley Heights (median $1,030,000) is roughly 38% cheaper to buy into than Hawkesbury Heights ($1,425,000). Over the past year, Hawkesbury Heights (0%) ran 12.6 percentage points ahead of Valley Heights (-12.6%) on house-price growth.

Valley Heights scores higher on walkability (0/100 vs 20/100 ), useful if you're optimising for a car-light household. On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Valley Heights (1065) sits above Hawkesbury Heights (1033).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

Valley Heights is the lower entry point at $1,030,000 median, 38% below the other suburb. For first home buyers, that translates to a smaller deposit and lower stamp duty bill.

For investors

Investors face a yield-versus-growth split: Valley Heights delivers the better gross yield (3.84% vs 2.77%), but Hawkesbury Heights has run faster on capital growth this year. The right pick depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow or capital appreciation.

For families

Valley Heights edges out on average school ICSEA (1065 vs 1033).

Common questionsHawkesbury Heights vs Valley Heights

Common questions

Is Hawkesbury Heights or Valley Heights cheaper to buy in?

Valley Heights has the lower median house price at $1,030,000, roughly 38% below Hawkesbury Heights ($1,425,000). The gap on units is usually similar but worth checking on the full suburb profiles.

Which has stronger property growth, Hawkesbury Heights or Valley Heights?

Over the past 12 months, Hawkesbury Heights grew 0% vs -12.6% in Valley Heights, a gap of 12.6 percentage points. Twelve-month growth can swing year to year, so weight long-run trends from the individual suburb profiles before making a buy decision.

Does Hawkesbury Heights or Valley Heights have better schools?

On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Valley Heights scores 1065 vs 1033 in Hawkesbury Heights. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.

Which is more walkable, Hawkesbury Heights or Valley Heights?

Valley Heights scores 20/100 on walkability vs 0/100. Above 70 is considered very walkable (most errands on foot), 50-69 is walkable for some errands, below 50 typically requires a car for daily life.

Which suburb has higher rental yield, Hawkesbury Heights or Valley Heights?

Gross rental yield on houses is 3.84% in Valley Heights vs 2.77% in Hawkesbury Heights. Gross yield equals annual rent divided by purchase price. Net yield (after strata, rates, insurance, agent fees and maintenance) typically runs 1.5-2 percentage points lower.

The numbers behind the take

Hawkesbury Heights
Metric
Valley Heights

Price & Market

$1,425,000
Median house
$1,030,000
$343,440
Median unit
$343,440
+0.0%
Annual growth (house)
-12.6%
Days on market

Rental

$760/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$760/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
90.0%
Owner occupied
88.0%
13.0%
Renter occupied
10.0%

Lifestyle & Demographics

0
Walk score
20
0
Transit score
10
0
Bike score
5
468
Population
1,188
35
Median age
44

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

20
Schools nearby
20
1033
Avg ICSEA
1065

Climate

1302 mm
Annual rainfall
1302 mm
26.0°C
Mean max (Jan)
26.0°C

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).