Side by sideSuburb comparison

Heytesbury Lower vs Curdievale.

Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk. Heytesbury Lower edges out on more headline metrics in this comparison.

On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Heytesbury Lower (982) sits above Curdievale (980). Curdievale skews owner-occupied (78%), Heytesbury Lower runs more rental-dense (54% owner).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.

For investors

Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.

For families

Heytesbury Lower edges out on average school ICSEA (982 vs 980). Curdievale also has a higher family-household share (83% vs 54%), so the catchment community skews family-heavy.

Common questionsHeytesbury Lower vs Curdievale

Common questions

Does Heytesbury Lower or Curdievale have better schools?

On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Heytesbury Lower scores 982 vs 980 in Curdievale. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.

The numbers behind the take

Heytesbury Lower
Metric
Curdievale

Price & Market

Median house
Median unit
+0.0%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
Days on market

Rental

$239/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$239/wk
$100/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$190/wk
54.0%
Owner occupied
78.0%
23.0%
Renter occupied

Lifestyle & Demographics

0
Walk score
0
0
Transit score
0
5
Bike score
0
39
Population
125
49
Median age
44

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

11
Schools nearby
2
982
Avg ICSEA
980

Climate

Annual rainfall
Mean max (Jan)

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).